Douglas Petrovich presented a framework for building a sound chronology of the Old Testament at the 2023 Chafers Theological Seminary Pastors’ Conference. If one chooses appropriate assumptions one can come up with a chronology that is faithful to the Bible and also synchronizes with Egyptian and Assyrian chronologies. This confirms the reliability of the biblical record as history.
To build this chronology one needs certain dates that one has confidence in to serve as “tent pegs” as Petrovich calls them. Reaching consensus on what those tent pegs are is not easy but it is achievable. Having that chronology allows one to date and make sense out of the archeological data. That we need to go through so much trouble to construct such a chronology is reason to believe that mankind is very young.
Construction Begins on the First Temple—967 BC
I Kings 6:1
And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month Zif, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of the Lord.
Can we find what year Solomon began to build the first temple in our calendar? James Ussher in his Annals of the World gave the date as 1012 BC. Edwin Thiele was able to establish an absolute date based on Assyrian records linked to a solar eclipse which occurred in June 15, 763, in The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings. This allows one to come up with 967 BC as the year Solomon initiated the building of the first temple. There is a discrepancy of 45 years between these dates. Rodger Young clarified the issues around this discrepancy in Ussher Explained and Corrected arguing in favor of the 967 BC date which Petrovich accepts.
Israelite Exodus from Egypt—1446 BC
Accepting 967 BC and the information in 1 Kings 6:1 about the Exodus occurring in the 480th year one can date the Exodus back to 1446 BC (967+479=1446). From this date and knowing the Israelites wandered for 40 years in the desert (Numbers 32:13) we get the year they crossed the Jordan into Canaan as 1406 BC (1406+40=1446).
Jacob Moves His Family to Egypt—1876 BC
If one concludes as Petrovich does (see his Origins of the Hebrews, 2021) that the Israelites spent 430 years in Egypt, the “long sojourn”, rather than 215 years, the “short sojourn”, then the date the long sojourn began would be 1876 BC. It becomes another tent peg (1446+430=1876). The date the short sojourn began would be 1661 BC (1446+215=1661).
The reason for the 215 year discrepancy is due to textual variants of Exodus 12:40. The Masoretic Hebrew text gives 430 years in Egypt. The Septuagint Greek text said this period of time included time in Canaan.
______
This lecture highlights the resolution of difficulties permitting one to construct a sound Old Testament chronology. At 19:25 in the video Petrovich lists the major dates going back to Abraham. At 55:15 he presents the Egyptian chronological scheme.
He recommended the following sources for those interested in pursuing biblical chronology further:
Andrew Steinmann, From Abraham to Paul, Concordia Publishing House 2011
Edwin R. Thiele, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1994)
Rodger C. Young, Ussher Explained and Corrected, Bible and Spade 31/2 (2018), 47-58
______
Why Mankind Is Very Young
William Lane Craig, the professor of philosophy at Houston Baptist University and research professor of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology, asserts, “Adam plausibly lived sometime between around 1 million years ago to 750,000 years ago, a conclusion consistent with the evidence of population genetics.” (The Historical Adam, First Things, October 2021).
Much of the Old Testament chronology presented above goes back less than 4000 years. However, it involves controversy as to when something actually happened. This should make anyone pause who claims that humanity has been on this earth for much longer than 8000 years. Why? Because there is no historical evidence to justify that claim. Furthermore Biblical textual variants do not even justify ages as old as 8000 years.
From available historical evidence we know we can go from stone age to space age in about 5000 years. That means if humanity were around for 100,000 years (let alone the million that Craig finds plausible) we would have historical records going back 90,000 years assuming a generous 10,000 years to go from stone age to space age.
If we had such historical records then there would be no doubt about what happened a mere 4000 years ago. We would have archived video recordings of Solomon holding a press conference broadcasted live to the entire world via satellite in 967 BC about the construction of the temple. We would know precisely when that press conference started. Constructing a sound biblical chronology would not be the problem that it is today.
Since we don’t have that kind of historical record it is reasonable to doubt the non-historical dating methods and speculations that extend mankind back hundreds of thousands of years. Mankind is nowhere near that old.
Interesting topic, Frank…the earth may also be younger than some people have thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it is also very young, less than 8000 years as well. The arguments for that would be different, but compelling arguments do exist. Douglas Petrovich mentioned the sequel to “Is Genesis History?” called “Mountains After the Flood”: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEVsU6O-XMpFkYxiEhIllaQZWzOPFp-YB.
Thank you, Lynn!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing the link!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for showcasing the work of Douglas Petrovich. I have saved his video to watch later. I am very interested in learning more from him.
Blessings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both Douglas Petrovich and Henry Smith from Associates for Biblical Research are the main sources I trust (at the moment) for biblical chronology. They don’t agree with other creationists since they don’t agree with Ussher, but they are able to construct a biblical chronology that fits Egyptian and Assyrian chronologies. Neither of these two divergent positions on creationism agree with William Lane Craig.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the beginning God created, Gen 1:1
Amen Rev 22:21 (It is so)
All that lies in between is true.
Faith in who God is and what He says is so much easier or me than trying to prove who God is and what He says.
Thank you for doing your homework Frank!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Mary, and blessings to you! I agree: All that lies between Gen 1:1 and Rev 22:21 is true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I need to read the book he recommended: The mysterious numbers of the Hebwrew kings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both Andrew Steinmann’s and Edwin Thiele’s books are on Internet Archive. I haven’t read them yet, but I hope to do so. Thank you, Jim!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow good to know!
LikeLiked by 1 person